Blogging vs. Tweeting

I’ve noticed that active tweeting has resulted in fewer potential blog topics. Why? In Twitter, I can comment on something very quickly. Composing a blog post takes much more energy.

For example, I love Python Essential Reference, and I pre-ordered the fourth edition. (David Beazley is The Man!) I recommended PER on Twitter (and even had a Twitter conversation about it, which I cannot find now because Twitter search sucks like a Hoover), and therefore didn’t feel an impetus to write a post about it. I had quickly and easily satisfied my urge to recommend the book, via Twitter.

Others have also noticed this effect. Other posts are more wordy deep than necessary on this… I don’t see the comparison as cosmically subtle. Tweets have a lower creation cost than blog posts. Duh! One hundred forty characters and -boom- you’re done. A blog post can be pithy — indeed, that’s some bloggers’ preferred writing style — but my kind of posts demand some thought, editing, maybe image or quote insertions, adding links, etc. The work for even a simple post is at least 100x that of a Tweet.


Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

2 thoughts on “Blogging vs. Tweeting

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.