How to Argue


Starts with a Bang!’s Ethan Siegel posted a nice summary of a 2008 Paul Graham post about different argumentation levels. At the hierarchy’s bottom is name calling (“Jane, you ignorant slut!”) and at the top is substantive reasoning that focuses on the point being made.

He used a dandy graphic to summarize the hierarchy:

Disagreement hierarchy

Disagreement hierarchy

I wish I could claim to always operate at the top level. Nuh-uh. More times than I’d care to admit, I flounder around in the middle levels. We’d all be better off if we at least aspired to operate at the upper levels.

For more, read “Weekend Diversion: How to Argue“.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: